Discussion:
Time to get busy writing to your congress critter or there won't be a need for hawaii inet-providers...
(too old to reply)
Michael Painter
2005-06-29 04:58:54 UTC
Permalink
http://www.freepress.net/press/release.php?id=80

The Brand X decision is not only absurd on its face, it is an insult to the
American ideals of competitive markets, equal opportunity, and the free flow
of information. This short-sighted decision to eliminate common carrier
requirements on broadband networks essentially grants the incumbent cable
giants the prerogative to stifle all competitive access to their wires. If
the telephone companies receive similar exemptions - as is expected - the
cozy duopoly of cable and DSL that controls more than 95 percent of the
broadband market will be entrenched for a generation. There will be no
competitive broadband carriers. There will be no independent ISPs. The
thriving new market for Voice Over Internet Protocol (VOIP) may be badly
destabilized. The owners of the wires will likely determine what content is
and is not appropriate to travel over their networks.

...The response from the public and its representatives in Congress must be
firm, swift and resolute. The open proceedings at the FCC dealing with
nondiscrimination on wireline networks should become a focal point of
attention for advocates of telecom policy in the public interest. Congress
must seek to reverse the FCC's misguided judgment, re-establishing rules
that protect open access to communications networks. Far from granting the
phone companies the same exemptions, Congress should write an unambiguous
statute guarding communications network from monopoly domination.
Nai`a
2005-06-30 03:09:15 UTC
Permalink
Congress must seek to reverse the FCC's misguided judgment, ...
*THIS* congress?
You're joking, right?
There's a reason it's called, 'Congress'.
And we've known for some time who it's in bed with.

:(

Aloha mai Nai`a!
--
" So this is how Liberty dies ... http://www.lava.net/~mjwise/
" To Thunderous Applause.
Michael Painter
2005-07-01 20:45:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Nai`a
Congress must seek to reverse the FCC's misguided judgment, ...
*THIS* congress?
You're joking, right?
There's a reason it's called, 'Congress'.
And we've known for some time who it's in bed with.
Yeah...well, um...I'm afraid you're correct.<sigh>
People don't read books.
http://www.hevanet.com/peace/usgovcorruption.htm
Nai`a
2005-07-01 21:35:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Michael Painter
Yeah...well, um...I'm afraid you're correct.<sigh>
I'm afraid, too, if that's any consolation.
Just not about the things the government wants me to be afraid of.
Post by Michael Painter
People don't read books.
http://www.hevanet.com/peace/usgovcorruption.htm
" "Patriotism is supporting your country all the time,
" and your government when it deserves it." -- Mark Twain

<http://www.cafepress.com/dumpdumbya>

Or watch decent TV.

<http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/3755686.stm>

Aloha mai Nai`a!
--
" So this is how Liberty dies ... http://www.lava.net/~mjwise/
" To Thunderous Applause.
Michael Painter
2005-07-23 05:13:50 UTC
Permalink
From the isp-dsl mail list:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

To: <isp-***@isp-dsl.com>
Subject: Re: [isp-dsl] Martin interview - it's OK to swear
I am one of the few that has acutally met the man. We went to the FCC
last year lobbying for our cause.
Until last year, he was a pretty big advocate of competition, and was
a decent ally. In fact, he was more
than hospitable and genuinely interested in what we had to say. He
even played with one of our
voip phones while we were there!
Anyhow, then he stopped listening, and kept his mouth shut on
everything. It is my FIRM belief that the
King Bush admin told him that if he would shut up, he'd be the next
commissioner, and now is clearly
in their corner. I really believe that.
What a jerk!
joe
Cynthia has also met with him as well and gave the same impression and added
he was consistently being beat up from his Republican bureaucrats, for not
being a puppet and doing things all Powell's way. Even the WSJ brought up
the same scenario.

But now he has told the competitive services providers that it is
unfortunate, they will become the collateral damage of the political agenda
under the Bush regime.

As much as people do not like bringing politics into it, this IS politics
and it is effecting consumers and businesses. ISP's have a built in lobby
group and that is their customers. There are many ways to get involved, to
get your customers involved and to bring a wrath of voters knocking on the
state and federal elected officials door.

Congressional aids tell us it takes seven letters from constituents to get
noticed. They also tell us that each letter, fax, email or phone call weighs
in at 35,000 per topic, of other people having the same view.

And the ISPs need to participate in the notice and comment process,
individually and as part any association they may belong to. Last November,
Bell South (Dkt 04-405) flinched when many customer comments came in, that
they asked for an extension to digest all the comments for a reply. This has
not happened before as far back as I can see in the online records.
Extensions have been granted before, but usually because of holidays and
other time related issues.

We need show up at the dance, and be ready to dance toe-to-toe.



Frank Muto
Co-founder - Washington Bureau for ISP Advocacy - WBIA
Telecom Summit Ad Hoc Committee
http://gigabytemarch.blog.com/ www.wbia.us
Michael Painter
2005-08-03 20:36:25 UTC
Permalink
For all competitive service providers, or other businesses offering Internet
related products and or services, and their customers.


Tomorrow, or very soon thereafter, we will see the FCC deregulate Open
Access. What does this mean and what should you do?

While the answers are not clear on what the new terms and conditions for
access (if any) will mean to thousands of ISP's we do know that this does
not bode well for the future of our industry. While the argument on the
Hill has been that this will create greater competition, any first grader
who can count apples and oranges will recognize that when you take a bunch
of them off the table there will be fewer to count and compete. It defies
logic that the Bells have been able to sell this argument, but I suppose if
you say it long and loud enough it mysteriously becomes a truth.

First, brace yourself for it is going to be a rough and bumpy ride. Second,
while it will not change the immediate outcome, it is contingent upon us to
mobilize and send a message to the FCC that we are watching and are
organizing our industry, business and consumers in opposition.

As soon as you read this message take a moment to send word to each of the
FCC Commissioners about your concerns and the consequences to your business
and that the ultimate impact of deregulation will be bad for America, small
business, consumers and our economy. It would also be a good idea to copy
your congressional representatives office when you send the message. You
can find congressional contact information in the WBIA Legislative Action
Center at http://capwiz.com/wbia/home/.

For your convenience we have provided the Email address for each of the FCC
Commissioners and a sample letter which you are welcome to use in crafting
your own message. Edit accordingly to give out to your customers.

For posting a letter (not comment) on the FCC Electronic Comment Filing
System, do one post each of the following dockets: 04-29, 04-416, 04-440 and
04-405. Copy, paste and edit the below sample letter, edit to your liking
and submit a PDF or Word .doc.

Make sure they know who you are and use company letter head. Create another
for your customers and or have them sign off on a petition and list all
those separately on the letters and ECFS uploaded lists.


Chairman Kevin Martin - ***@fcc.gov
Commissioner Michael Copps - ***@fcc.gov
Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein - ***@fcc.gov
Commissioner Kathleen Abernathy - ***@fcc.gov

Dear Chairman or Commissioner _________;

We are an ISP, CLEC, or whatever in City_______, State_____ and serve
#'s______ of customers. Deregulation will harm our business and the ability
to provide competitive services to our customers. Consumers need and
deserve the choice they enjoy today and deregulation will take away their
right to choose providers and services.

President Bush signed Executive Order 13272 on August 13, 2002 requiring
federal agencies to implement policies protecting small entities when
writing new rules and regulations. President Bush' Small Business Agenda
states that every new business starts with an idea for a better product or
process, which has been the driving force of Internet innovation we enjoy
today.

These ideas become reality only when confident entrepreneurs are willing to
take economic risks and ISP's have gallantly taken this risk. Small
businesses are the heart of the American economy because they drive
innovation - new firms are established on the very premise that they can do
a better job and recognize that a one-size-fits all approach is not good for
business and innovation.

A few legacy carriers cannot continue to benefit from valuable government
grants and licenses, including the use of public rights-of-way, and be
allowed to extend those rights in a way that bars others from offering their
service to the public.

President Bush has called for recognition that supporting America's small
businesses is critical to ensuring continued job creation. Today, small
businesses create two-thirds of new private sector jobs in America, employ
more than half of all workers, and account for more than half of the output
of our economy.

The FCC has been entrusted with protecting consumers, encouraging economic
development, and ensuring that competition is allowed to develop, rather
than being quashed by a deregulated monopoly. Already, we are seeing the
Bells move to increase prices, and without regulation, small business will
be harmed, thousands of ISP's will be forced out business, highly-skilled
workers will lose their jobs and consumers will lose the choice of platform
for broadband services and support.

Deregulation will be bad for America and we encourage to reconsider
deregulating open access.






Cynthia H. de Lorenzi
Co-founder
Washington Bureau for ISP Advocacy (WBIA)
http://www.wbia.us
***@wbia.us


Frank Muto
Co-founder - Washington Bureau for ISP Advocacy - WBIA
Telecom Summit Ad Hoc Committee
http://gigabytemarch.blog.com/ www.wbia.us


"We believe that all Americans are entitled to freedom of choice and that
true competition is unbiased of its provider network. That we be allowed
access to those networks to give all Americans their right to choose any mix
of service or services they choose."

"We recognize that laws and policies must maintain equal, fair and
nondiscriminatory access for all providers and that such laws and policies
be upheld."


__________________________________________________
ISPCON Fall 2005 - October 18-20, Santa Clara, CA
FREE EXHIBITS ONLY PASS AVAILABLE NOW! www.ispcon.com
ISPCON in Baltimore was jumping! Sign up NOW for the fall event in Santa
Clara.. don't miss a minute!


_____________  The ISP-CLEC Discussion List  _____________
To Join: mailto:join-isp-***@isp-clec.com
To Remove: mailto:remove-isp-***@isp-clec.com
Archives: http://isp-lists.isp-planet.com/isp-clec/archives/
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

Copyright 2005 Jupitermedia Corporation All Rights Reserved.

Loading...